As a Jacksonville Business Lawyer, I often run up against cases which involve unclean hands. This defense to a claim can limit or eliminate a potential recovery.
Definition: Unclean hands is a legal doctrine which is a defense to a complaint, which states that a party who is asking for a judgment cannot have the help of the court if he/she has done anything unethical in relation to the subject of the lawsuit. Thus, if a defendant can show the plaintiff had "unclean hands," the plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed or the plaintiff will be denied judgment. Unclean hands is a common "affirmative defense" pleaded by defendants and must be proved by the defendant. Example: Hank Hardnose sues Grace Goodenough for breach of contract for failure to pay the full amount for construction of an addition to her house. Goodenough proves that Hardnose had shown her faked estimates from subcontractors to justify his original bid to Goodenough.
Florida legal theories and defenses
The Doctrine of Unclean Hands: plaintiffs who seek a remedy in equity with “unclean hands,” which does not require the commission of a crime but only acts “condemned by honest and reasonable” persons, will be denied relief. Roberts v. Roberts, 84 So. 2d 717, 720 (Fla. 1956).
Defenses
1. Unclean Hands: One who seeks the aid of equity must do so with clean hands. Bradley v. Health Coalition, Inc., 687 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). This rule applies to the State when it becomes a litigant. Valdez v. State, 194 So. 388, 394 (Fla. 1940).
2. Totality of the Circumstances: In deciding whether to issue an injunction in a particular case, a trial court must consider the totality of the circumstances and determine whether injunctive relief is necessary to achieve justice between the parties. This well-settled maxim of equity jurisprudence is summarized in §936 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1979): The appropriateness of the remedy of injunction against a tort depends upon a comparative appraisal of all of the factors in the case, including the following primary factors:
(a) the nature of the interest to be protected,Davis v. Joyner, 409 So.2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
(b) the relative adequacy to the plaintiff of injunction and of other remedies,
(c) any unreasonable delay by the plaintiff in bringing suit,
(d) any related misconduct on the part of the plaintiff,
(e) the relative hardship likely to result to defendant if an injunction is granted and to plaintiff if it is denied,
(f) the interests of third persons and of the public, and
(g) the practicability of framing and enforcing the order or judgment.
If you feel that you are dealing with a case which involves Unclean hands, you should discuss the facts and circumstances with a Florida Business Lawyer.
