Jacksonville FL, St. Augustine, Orange Park, Jacksonville Beach, Ponte Vedra Beach
January 7, 2009

Jacksonville Non-Compete Agreements

employment-agreements.jpeg
As a Jacksonville Florida non-compete Lawyer, I often am asked about some of the provisions that are contained in a Florida employment agreement. I found an article on the Texas Non-Compete Law Blog, entitled Texas Executive Employment Agreements: Checklist for Employees and thought that the information would be relevant to my Jacksonville Clients. I have based this information on what was contained in that article, but modified removed some information and added some that is specific to Jacksonville and throughout Florida .

1. Term of Employment. Employment agreements are either for a fixed term or at-will. Most at-will employment agreement can be terminated by either party at any time for any reason. Some Jacksonville employment agreements are for a fixed term (e.g., a six-months or one-year term) also contain provisions pursuant to which the employer may terminate the employee “for any reason” on shorter notice (e.g., “thirty days’ notice”). Such an agreement is in reality a 30-day employment contract.

2. Position, job duties, location. Florida Employment agreements routinely contain provisions outlining what the employee’s title will be, what their duties will be, who the supervisor will be, and where the work will be performed.

3. Compensation. Employment agreements often reference compensation or salary and sometimes discretionary compensation (e.g. bonuses and stock options).
4. Termination for Cause. Employment agreements often provide that an employee may be terminated for “cause,” and “cause” is defined to include various acts or omissions by the employee. Some acts—like commission of a felony and embezzlement of company funds are fairly easy to understand. However, defining “cause” to include the employee’s failure to perform his/her job duties can be difficult because this can be subjective. Employees want what a clear non subjective definition of cause.


5. Classification. Employment agreements often reference an employees status as exempt or non-exempt. In some cases employees are classified as independent contractors. Whether or not an employee is an independent contractor, an employee, exempt, or non-exempt is often a factual analysis of the interactions amongst employees and their employers.

6. Nondisclosure Agreements. Employment agreements can contain prohibitions on the disclosure of the employer’s confidential or proprietary information to a third party. An employee needs to know what information the employer considers to be confidential or proprietary. Employers need to notify employees what information they consider confidential or proprietary.

7. Non-compete Agreements: can contain provisions limiting an employee’s right to compete with the employer, both during and after employment. The provision should specify activities in which the employee may not engage. In Florida the geographic scope of the restrictions must be reasonable. Terms of non-compete agreements are limited in Florida, most agreements that are in excess of 2 years are considered unreasonable and the court may shorten the term.

8. Non-solicitation Agreements. Along with non-compete provisions, some employment agreements contain prohibitions on soliciting the employer’s customers, its employees, and/or its vendors. In Florida, these provisions are enforceable.

9. Change in Control. What happens if the employer is purchased by another company? Should that affect the employee’s obligations? Should the employee be able to escape his non-compete and non-solicitation obligations? On a related note, should the employer be able to assign the agreement to another company (so that the “new” company can enforce the employee’s non-compete and non-solicitation obligations)? Employment agreements don’t always address these issues, but employees are wise to think about them.

10. Arbitration. Employment agreements often state that legal disputes between employers and employees must be submitted to binding arbitration (versus being litigated in court). Provisions like this can be one-sided (i.e., sometimes, only the employee is required to arbitrate its disputes, whereas the employer can go to court). Employers need to be mindful of the effects of agreeing to arbitrate disputes as opposed to litigate them.

11. Choice of Law and Forum Selection. Employment agreements usually specify the state whose law will govern the agreement and the place where suit must be filed in the event of a legal dispute. The latter can be especially problematic for an employee, because it may require her to bring any claims she may have in a foreign state, which can be very expensive.

December 28, 2007

Funny Holiday Card- Florida Estate Planning Lawyer

Over the last weekend I tried to keep up with various websites. While Visiting Universal in Orlando with my family I say a posting by Michale with The Ohio Trust & Estate Blog and thought you might enjoy it also.
Jacksonville Business Planning and Contract Lawyer

October 29, 2007

Best Email Practices: Protecting the Company's Privilege (Part 3)

Jacksonville Corporate Business Litigation lawyer attorney, Jacksonville email discoveryThis is the third part to a series on Protecting the Company's Privilege and the dangers of Email. Click here if you missed Part 1 and Part 2. Many Jacksonville Business Lawyers tell their clients that email can be very dangerous in the event of litigation. One should always be careful before pressing the send button.

Some of the things you should implement in regards to email are:

1) Provide training to employees teach them what the proper steps are to prevent inadvertent disclosures, spoliation, and other risks from occurring.

2) Always separate business advice from legal advise, use lead ins to make it clear that what is being provided is legal advise.

3) Indicate in the communications when the communication is for legal purposes or in anticipation of litigation.

4) Limit the distribution of any disclosure to avoid waiver of privileges.

5) Teach and train that any disclosure, even an unintended one, can be a waiver of the privilege.

6) Create, implement, and audit your firms document retention policy.

If you have question on your Document retention policy or how your firm is using email on an internal and external basis, be sure to have a Florida Business Lawyer or Attorney review and audit your procedures.

October 10, 2007

Florida Breach of a Fiduciary Duty

As a Jacksonville Business Lawyer, I often run up against cases which involve a Breach of a Fiduciary Duty. These disputes can be between employees and employers, companies and their suppliers, Personal representatives and beneficiaries, guardians and wards, Trustees and beneficiaries, or officers, directors, managers and the company they work for.

Definition: a fiduciary relationship is where one person places complete confidence in another in regard to a particular transaction or one's general affairs or business. The relationship is not necessarily formally or legally established as in a declaration of trust, but can be one of moral or personal responsibility, due to the superior knowledge and training of the fiduciary as compared to the one whose affairs the fiduciary is handling.

Elements Cause of Action - Florida Supreme Court
The elements of a claim for breach of fiduciary duty are: the existence of a fiduciary duty, and the breach of that duty such that it is the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damages

If you feel that you are dealing with a breach of fiduciary duty and have suffered damages as a result, you should discuss the facts and circumstances with a Florida Business Lawyer.

October 10, 2007

Florida Breach of Contract

As a Jacksonville Business Lawyer, I often run up against cases which involve Contract disputes. These disputes can be between employees and employers, companies and their suppliers, or individuals and contractors.

Definition: failing to perform any term of a contract, written or oral, without a legitimate legal excuse. This may include not completing a job, not paying in full or on time, failure to deliver all the goods, substituting inferior or significantly different goods, not providing a bond when required, being late without excuse, or any act which shows the party will not complete the work ("anticipatory breach"). Breach of contract is one of the most common causes of law suits for damages and/or court-ordered "specific performance" of the contract.

Elements Cause of Action - 1st DCA
It is elementary that in order to recover on a claim for breach of contract the burden is upon the claimant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of a contract, a breach thereof and damages flowing from the breach.

To have a valid contract there must be an offer, acceptance, and consideration.
If you feel that you are dealing with a breach of contract and have suffered damages as a result, you should discuss the facts and circumstances with a Florida Business Lawyer.

October 8, 2007

Tortious Interference with a Contractual Right

As a Jacksonville Business Lawyer, I often run up against cases which involved Tortious Interference with a Contractual Right along with Claims for Beach of a Florida non-compete agreement. The elements of this cause of action are

1) The existence of contract to which plaintiff is a party;
2) Defendant's knowledge of the contract;
3) Defendant's intentional procurement of the contract's breach;
4) The absence of justification or privilege; and
5) Plaintiff suffered damages resulting from the breach.
Tortious interference with a contract is virtually identical to the elements of a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship.

There are many defenses to Tortious Interference with a Contractual Right. They include

1) Affirmative defenses
2) Statute of limitations - four years
3) Defendant is not liable where she did not "intentionally" interfere with plaintiff's business relationship.
4) Acts occurring during a judicial proceeding are absolutely privileged and cannot give rise to tortious interference claims.
5) When the contract provision expressly reserves the right of interference.
6) Agent that gives, on request by his or her principal "honest advise" in his or her principal's best interest.
7) Plaintiff cant bring action against party of the contract at issue.
8 )Privileged or justified conduct does not give rise to Tortious interference claim.
9) Defendant acting to protect her own economic or financial interest is not liavle for tortious interference.
10) Plaintiff cannot premise claim on alleged interference with a contract that is terminable at will provided that interference is lawful competition.
11) Defendant's settlement of a lawsuit that adversely affects plaintiff's business interest does not give rise to Tortious interference claim.
If you feel that an employee has breached their Florida Non-Compete Agreement or has interfered with a contract between you and a client, you should discuss the facts and circumstances with a Florida Business Lawyer.

September 7, 2007

Florida Breach of Fiduciary Duty Liability

Often we find articles on other blogs that may be of great interest to our readers. Flprobatelitigation.com has recently written a great review of a recent Florida probate Case. This case should be of particular interest to Florida estate planning lawyers, Florida probate lawyers, and even Florida Business lawyers.

This case could have broad implications on the statute of limitation dealing with Florida business law, Florida estate planning, and Florida probate, as there are often fiduciary duties that are created.

Although the set of facts in this case dealt with Probate, its not unreasonable to see courts considering this line of thinking in other areas were there is a breach of a fiduciary duty.

In Kravitz v. Levy Fla 2007 WL 2480538 (Fla. 4th DCA Sep 05, 2007)

The court found that even after 41 years, the Continuing torts doctrine allowed a family the opportunity to recover from a PR when they discovered the PR had breached his fiduciary duty to the family. The court reasoned that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the PR died, which was when the issues were discovered.