Articles Posted in Estate Planning

Florida Estate Planning and LicensingA federal curt found that Marilyn Monroe was a New Yorker when she died in 1962. This means her estate which has earned more than 30 million dollars licensing her image can not control the licensing. Product makers may be free to use her image without paying licensing fees to her estate because of a difference between California and New York state laws.

Marilyn Monroe LLC plans to appeal the ruling. If you license your image, it may be important to look at the laws of your state to determine what rights your estate will have. If you have questions about licensing in your state you should Contact a Florida Estate Planning Lawyer to discuss the effects of your domicile on your future heirs.

City of Key West v. Knowles, 948 So.2d 58 (Fla. 3 DCA January 10, 2007)

A surviving spouse sued the city of Key West, Florida claiming she was deprived of her property interest in her husband’s buried remains without due process in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983.

The Court found that an individual has no constitutionally protected property interest to a decedent’s remains after the point of burial or other lawful disposition, the appellate court reversed the $15,000 jury verdict that had been entered in favor of the surviving spouse.

Chames v. Demavo, 32 Fla. L. Weekly S820 CR. Sup. Ct. December 20, 2007

An attorney owed fees from his clients under a retainer agreement attempted to enforce a lien against the homestead of the clients. The retainer agreement had expressly waived the parties’ constitutional homestead protection against claims of creditors.

Asking the Court to recede from prior Florida precedent in Carter and Sherbill, the appellant argued the 1995 constitutional amendment removing “head of family” changed the purpose of the creditor protection, that the trend in other states was to permit waivers, and permitting the waiver was consistent with other precedent allowing waivers.

I am currently in Shanghai China for the next 5 days and then heading to Osaka and Tokyo for 3 nights each. I am planning to keep posting new issues to my blog while I am gone. In addition, I will be responding to emails and will be available over my VOIP number for calls or issues that need immediate attention. Feel free to continue to send in your questions. I wanted to apologize upfront for any additional delay in responses. Please be conscientious that it is 12 hours ahead of EST and this along with being on vacation means I will typically respond to any issues between 8AM – 12 PM EST or 8PM to -12AM my time.

Graham v. Florida Dept of Children and Families (Graham II), 970 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA December 5, 2007)

This is the continuing saga of the battle between Luke and Laurence over their mother Betty, who DCF had determined was in need of guardianship after determining “Luke is the son who most has Betty’s interests in mind.” After Laurence failed to comply with the guardianship court order to disclose the out-of-state location to which he had moved his mother, the court held him in civil contempt. The Court also appointed Luke as temporary plenary guardian of Betty’s person and property, electing to disregard an advance directive Betty had executed over 8 months after the guardianship proceedings had been initiated.

On appeal, the finding of contempt was reversed for failure to properly serve the order to show cause. The appellate court also reversed the order appointing temporary guardian, holding the trial court had failed to properly determine and indicate the specific grounds upon which the advance directive was revoked by the court. The court further noted that the surrogate under an advance directive is not under any duty to prove the validity of the advance directive. Finally, the court noted two of the examining committee reports were filed over two months before the final hearing and, relying upon two physicians’ affidavits filed before and after the hearing to determine incapacity use the wrong burden of proof – the correct burden of proof in a hearing to determine incapacity of a alleged incapacitated person (AIG) is by clear and convincing evidence. Thus the Court ordered the proceedings be dismissed.

Nebraska has joined the growing list of states in which we have a relationship with a lawyer who is familiar with the (NFA) National Firearms Act’s requirements relating to the formation of trusts to purchase Title II Firearms (sold by Class 3 SOT dealers). These include silencers, short barrel rifles, and machine guns.

If you are looking to create a Nebraska NFA Gun Trust, please Contact us and we can help make sure your trust deals with the many unique issues surrounding owning these firearms in a Revocable Trust.

If you live in Indiana or another state and wish to create a NFA trust to protect your family and purchase NFA firearms (Title II) or Title I firearms Contact a NFA Gun Trust Lawyer® in your state.

Indiana has joined the growing list of states in which we have a relationship with a lawyer who is familiar with the (NFA) National Firearms Act’s requirements relating to the formation of trusts to purchase Title II Firearms (sold by Class 3 SOT dealers). These include silencers, short barrel rifles, and machine guns.

If you are looking to create a Indiana NFA Gun Trust, please Contact us and we can help make sure your trust deals with the many unique issues surrounding owning these firearms in a Revocable Trust.

If you live in Indiana or another state and wish to create a NFA trust to protect your family and purchase NFA firearms (Title II) or Title I firearms Contact a NFA Gun Trust Lawyer® in your state.

Miller v. Goodall, 958 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA April 25, 2007)

A daughter filed a petition to determine her mother’s incapacity and be appointed as guardian.

The ward’s sister (daughter’s aunt) also filed a petition seeking to be appointed as plenary guardian.

Gurfinkel v. Marmor, 32 Fla. L. Weekly D2931 (Fla. 3rd DCA December 12, 2007)

The decedent’s trust beneficiaries challenged a pre-death “amendment” executed by the decedent’s spouse as attorney in fact pursuant to a valid Durable Power of Attorney . The amendment “deleted” the trust’s primary asset stock in a family corporation. The stock was subsequently transferred to one of the decedent’s sons. The trial court relied upon language in the Durable Power of Attorney to uphold the amendment. The appellate court reversed, relying upon language in the Trust which indicted powers granted by the trust could be exercised only by the grantor and not by a conservator, guardian, or any person other than the grantor.

What does this mean, if you want your agent acting under a Durable Power of Attorney to be able to change your trust, your trust should include language to allow for it.

Bryan v.Dethlefs, 959 So. 2d 314 (FIa. 3d DCA May 16, 2007)

The decedent’s trust stated,

“Upon my death, the then balance of principal and accumulated income remaining in the trust fund shall be distributed to my grandson, Robert R. Bizzell, if he is living at the time of distribution.”

The trust provided for distributions to other beneficiaries if Bizzell was not living.

Contact Information